Knowing Your Soil pH is More Important Than Ever

*This content was previously published by Corteva Agriscience.

With another year of expected high input costs, Andrew Luzum, Nutrient Maximizer Strategic Account Manager, Corteva Agriscience, says that knowing your soil pH will be key to improving fertilizer efficiency this year. “Soil pH allows nutrient availability and will be the biggest player as we head into another year of high-priced fertilizer. From there, you can fine-tune nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium rates,” Luzum says. The pH value is a measurement of acidity, and every plant has a pH range in which it thrives. For corn and soybeans, the ideal range is generally around 6.0 to 7.0. This is the range in which most essential nutrients are available and microbial activity is sufficient for crop production.

What happens when soil pH is too high?

As soil pH increases and becomes more alkaline, important nutrients for plant growth — such as phosphorus, calcium and magnesium — become less available. Soil degradation, herbicide carry-over and drought-like symptoms are more likely to occur in soils with high pH levels.

Reducing soil pH for corn and soybean production often does not create a positive economic return, so selecting the right hybrids and varieties tolerant to field conditions is the most important management decision for high pH soils.

What happens when soil pH is too low?

As soil pH decreases and soils become more acidic, macronutrient availability decreases and micronutrients can increase to toxic levels. Aluminum toxicity is a major concern in acidic soils, as nutrient and water uptake are restricted. Soybean nodulation is also reduced in acidic soils, which can result in nitrogen deficiency.

Soil test results will help determine if a soil amendment is needed to increase soil pH to optimum levels.

“Soil tests don’t lie; they help guide us to what we need to fix. The ability to maximize fertilizer efficiency is always money well spent,” Luzum says. He recommends soil testing each field at least every three to four years, either in the spring or fall. Sampling at the same time each year provides more comparable test results. It’s also important to sample when crops are not growing in the field (with standard soil sampling) and to avoid fields where fertilizer, manure, or liming materials were recently applied.

Because soil pH levels and fertilizer recommendations vary by location, it’s important to consult local experts with questions regarding nutrient management and soil sampling best practices. Reach out to your local extension service, retailer and/or your Corteva Agriscience account manager to learn more about soil sampling and ways to manage pH in fields.

Article Link

®™Trademarks of Corteva Agriscience and its affiliated companies. ©2024 Corteva. 022661 LC (08/24

Benefits & Management of Crop Rotation

Crop rotation is a component of crop production and an implement for farm management, as it balances agronomy and economic market realities. From an agronomic perspective, crop rotation can increase nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency, decrease plant diseases and insect pests, assist in managing weeds, reduce soil erosion, and increase soil health. A common rotational system in many farming regions is corn followed by soybean for a two-year rotational program. Research at Iowa State University on extended multi-year rotations of three to four years found that although net economic returns did not differ between the cropping systems, corn and soybean yield potential increased, soil health improved, soil erosion decreased, herbicide and nitrogen (N) fertilizer use decreased, and some plant diseases were reduced.(1)

Managing Risk with Crop Rotation
Crop rotation can help reduce the risk of adverse environmental stress, such as drought, early frost, and wet springs that result in a delayed planting window. It can help reduce the risk of an economically significant infestation of insects that are specific to a crop for a part of their life cycle, such as the corn rootworm complex and soybean aphid. Most foliar plant diseases are also specific to a certain crop species and, therefore, rotation can help reduce the risk of economic loss as the result of plant diseases such as Northern corn leaf blight, brown stem rot of soybean, and tar spot in corn.

The cropping sequence of the rotational system should also be considered, as certain sequences may be detrimental and increase disease risk. For example, corn grown before wheat can increase the incidence of fusarium head blight (wheat scab) in wheat. Additionally, there are some root and crown diseases of wheat that can also increase in incidence in a corn-wheat rotation system, as corn can be infected by some wheat diseases as well.2 A tool to assist in determining the economic returns from a corn-soybean and a corn-soybean-wheat rotation has been developed at the University of Illinois and is available at https://farmdoc.illinois.edu/fast-tools/planting-decision-model.

Managing Resources with Crop Rotation
Crop rotation can help increase environmental resource use and producer time efficiency. Water use rates can be very different between crops. For example, corn is considered a high water-use crop compared to wheat and soybean.2 Therefore, after drought, a crop with a lower water use rate should follow corn in rotation if soil moisture is not restored to full capacity during the off season.

Crop rotation can improve time management as well, as it allows farmers to spread the workload over a longer time. Equipment and labor can be more efficiently used because different crops are planted, managed during the growing season, and harvested at different times.

Managing Weeds with Crop Rotation
Many weed management plans include crop rotation as a tactic. A single crop in a continuous cropping system can become infested with a weed species that has adapted to the crop being grown and the management system being used. Alternatively, a diverse crop rotation changes the weeds’ environment. The changing environmental conditions prevent any one weed species from becoming dominant, which helps to prevent the overreliance on a single herbicide that can lead to herbicide resistance in weeds.

A survey of the scientific literature indicated that crop rotation resulted in lower weed densities in 21 cases, higher weed densities in 1 case, and equal weed densities in 5 cases compared to continuous cropping of a single crop. In 12 studies, the weed seed bank density was also reported for crop rotation and continuous cropping systems. In these studies, the weed seed bank density was lower with crop rotation in 9 cases and equivalent in 3 compared to continuous cropping.(3)

Carbon Sequestration with Crop Rotation
In a long-term study in Illinois, a continuous corn production system lost about 30% of the soil carbon when compared to a corn-oats-clover rotation system. However, recent studies have indicated that the tillage system, specifically no-till systems, in conjunction with crop rotation can play a major role in maintaining or increasing soil carbon content.(4)

Final Thoughts Using cover crops is also a way to introduce diversity into the cropping system. Please see the Bayer ForGround Resource Library for more information adding cover crops into your cropping rotation.

Here are some things farmers should consider when deciding whether to add a rotational crop into their cropping system.

• Do I have a market for the crop I am adding to the rotation?
• Is the crop a grass or broadleaf, which would have implications for the herbicide program?
• Is the crop an annual, biennial, or perennial?
• Is the crop a cool-season plant or a warm-season plant?
• Does the seeding date require a fall seeded, early spring, or late spring planting window?
• Is the crop harvested once during the growing season or multiple times?
• What are the fertility and pH requirements of the rotational crop?
• Will my equipment match up with the what the crop requires for planting, maintenance, and harvesting?

Article Link

Sources:
1 Liebman, M.Z., Chase, C.A., Johanns, A.M., Sundberg, D.N. 2013. Agronomic and economic performance of three crop rotation systems in Central Iowa. Iowa State Research Farm Progress Reports. 1889. https://lib. dr.iastate.edu/farms_reports/1889/.
2 Beck, R. 2021. Crop rotation in farm management. South Dakota State University Extension. https://extension.sdstate.edu/crop-rotation-farm-management.
3 Liebman, M. and Dyck, E. 1993. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecological Applications. 3:92-122. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941795
4 Al-Kaisi, M. 2008. Impact of tillage and crop rotation systems on soil carbon sequestration. Iowa State University Extension. https://store.extension.iastate.edu/product/5453
Legal Statements
Performance may vary, from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and weather conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on the grower’s fields. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. (c)2023 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 1211_70389

Impact of Corn Hybrids with Multiple Traits

*This content was previously published by Corteva Agriscience.

PEST PROBLEMS IN CORN

Corn crops face several pest challenges from insects, weeds and even volunteer corn. There can be multiple ways to deal with these pressures, including incorporating integrated pest and/or weed management programs. However, attention also needs to be paid to the potential for weed and insect resistance. Left unchecked, insects like corn earworm and European corn borer can damage yields, with declines of up to 25% from corn borer presence.1 Weeds like waterhemp and marestail can take 5-20% and 32% of corn yield, respectively.2,3 Highly competitive volunteer corn can reduce yields by 13% in corn fields while encouraging western corn rootworm and gray leaf spot disease in later crops.

 

INTRODUCTION OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAITS

The 1996 release of herbicide-tolerant corn and hybrids with protection against European corn borer changed farming practices. Corn traits these days have built upon those foundations, allowing for the use of additional herbicides and protecting against more insects. Traits help protect yields against damage caused by pests — following their adoption corn yields have improved by about two bushels per acre annually, which is a bigger and more consistent improvement than what farmers had experienced previously.

Although hybrids with multiple traits may be more expensive than conventional hybrids, they can provide overall savings in terms of management, labor and fuel costs — especially when fuel prices are high or in areas where finding on-farm workers is a challenge. Yields also tend to be more consistent, especially when using corn hybrids with multiple stacked traits, according to data from the Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trials.

 

ADDRESSING WEED RESISTANCE WITH MULTIPLE MODES OF ACTION

Since the release of glyphosate-tolerant corn and the reliance on just one weed control method for so many years, 48 weed species have developed resistance.6 Bringing new traits to market takes a long time, which heightens the importance of employing an integrated weed management program that uses multiple tools — including row spacing, mechanical practices and incorporating herbicides with multiple, different modes of action.

Corn hybrids with tolerance to multiple herbicides allow for the use of more modes of action against weeds and extend the lifetime of these herbicides by delaying the development of resistance. For example, planting PowerCore® Enlist® corn provides tolerance to four herbicides, including 2,4-D choline, glyphosate, glufosinate and FOPs. Glufosinate and 2,4-D choline can help manage late-season broadleaf weeds and 2,4-D choline can be sprayed on PowerCore Enlist corn up to 30″ without causing damage. Having access to multiple modes of action also helps farmers address glyphosate-resistant grasses — including volunteer corn. Planting PowerCore Enlist corn, which is tolerant to FOPs, provides a way to control resistant grasses and volunteer non-Enlist® corn in Enlist corn fields with options like Assure II herbicide.

 

CONCLUSION

There is a selection of tools available to farmers seeking to control weeds and insects in corn fields. However, as weeds and insects develop resistance to chemical control products, making the best use of integrated programs helps protect yield potential and supports the use of current control methods into the future. Planting corn hybrids with tolerance to herbicides with multiple modes of action — like PowerCore Enlist corn — can be one way to help farmers manage weeds and pests.

Article Link

1 Myers, Scott, Michael Ballweg, and John Wedberg. “Assessing the Impact of European Corn Borer on Corn Grown for Silage,” Focus on Forage 3, no. 3(2000).
2 Hartzler, Bob, and Dawn Nordby. “Influence of Corn on Waterhemp Growth,” Iowa State University Extension and Outreach: Integrated Crop Management. Accessed September 1, 2022. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/encyclopedia/influence-corn-waterhemp-growth.
3 Soltani, Nader, Christy Shropshire, and Peter Sikkema. Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with tiafenacil mixes in corn.” Weed Technology 35, no. 6 (2021): 908-911 https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2021.44.
4 Chalal, Parminder, and Amit Jhala. “Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Volunteer Corn in LibertyLink Soybean.” Cropwatch. Updated June 12, 2017. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2017/control-glyphosate-resistant-volunteer-corn-liberty-link-soybean.
5 Gullickson, Gil. “Are Traits Worth the Expense?” Successful Farming March 10, 2017. Accessed September 1, 2022. https://www.agriculture.com/are-traits-worth-the-expense.
6 Baek, Yousoon, Lucas Bobadilla, Darci Giacomini, Jacob Montgomery, Brent Murphy, and Patrick Tranel. “Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds.” Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology vol. 255 (2021): 93-128.doi:10.1007/398_2020_55.
7 Blois, Matt. “Following several fallow decades, herbicide companies are searching for new modes of action.” C&EN 100 no 22, June 17, 2022. https://cen.acs.org/environment/pesticides/crop-protection-herbicide-mode-action-glyphosate/100/i22.
8 Hartzler, Robert, and Prashant Jha. “2021 Herbicide Guide for Iowa Corn and Soybean Production.” Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. Updated February 2021.
™ ® Trademarks of Corteva Agriscience and its affiliated companies. The transgenic soybean event in Enlist E3® soybeans is jointly developed and owned by Corteva Agriscience and M.S. Technologies L.L.C. Enlist Duo® and Enlist One® herbicides are not registered for sale or use in all states or counties. Contact your state pesticide regulatory agency to determine if a product is registered for sale or use in your area. Enlist Duo and Enlist One are the only 2,4-D products authorized for use with Enlist crops. Consult Enlist herbicide labels for weed species controlled. POWERCORE® multi-event technology developed by Corteva Agriscience and Monsanto. POWERCORE® is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC. Always follow IRM, grain marketing and all other stewardship practices and pesticide label directions. Bt products may not yet be registered in all states. Check with your seed representative for the registration status in your state. Assure® II herbicide is currently the only FOP herbicide for in-crop use with Enlist® corn. Assure II herbicide (quizalofop) is a Group 1 herbicide for grass control. Product responses can vary by location, pest population, environmental conditions, and agricultural practices. Please contact your Corteva Agriscience sales professional for information and suggestions specific to your operation. Individual results may vary. Various factors, including pest pressure, reduced susceptibility, and insect resistance in some pest populations may affect efficacy of certain corn technology products in some regions. To help extend durability of these technologies, Corteva Agriscience recommends you implement integrated pest management (IPM) practices such as crop rotation, cultural and biological control tactics (including rotating sources of Bt-protected corn traits), pest scouting, and appropriate use of pest thresholds when employing management practices such as insecticide application. You must also plant the required refuge when using these technologies. Please contact your sales professional or consult with your local university extension for more information regarding insect resistance management guidelines, best management practices and to understand whether there has been a shift in susceptibility or insect resistance with certain pests documented in your area. Bexfond™ biological fungicide, Hearken™ biological insecticide, Sosdia Stress abiotic stress mitigator, Sosdia Stress Plus abiotic stress mitigator and Utrisha™ N nutrient efficiency optimizer are not for sale or use in all states. Contact your state pesticide regulatory agency to determine if a product is registered for sale or use in your state. Liberty®, LibertyLink® and the Water Droplet Design are trademarks of BASF. Always read and follow label directions. © 2024 Corteva. Groundwork – March 2024

Why Preemergence Applications Always Pay Off

*This content was previously published by Corteva Agriscience.

Although it may be tempting to reduce herbicide costs by eliminating preemergence applications on soybean acres this season, doing so can lead to long-term consequences.

“Short-term savings on herbicide applications often result in increased costs and frustration in the long run,” says Scott Pringnitz, Market Development Specialist, Corteva Agriscience.

Here are three ways that incorporating preemergence applications as part of a full weed control program offer long-term benefits:

  1. Shifting weed populations. Weed spectrums are naturally shifting across the Midwest as populations escape herbicide program control. Pringnitz says waterhemp is one weed that will likely present more of a challenge to growers this season. “Waterhemp continues to increase in population density — germinating late into the growing season and affecting more acres over time,” Pringnitz says. A strong preemergence application with residual herbicides will help prevent challenging weeds like waterhemp from gaining a foothold in soybean fields.
  2. More modes of action. The chances of weeds developing resistance to herbicides that utilize a single mode of action are very high. Preemergence applications enable you to use more modes of action and residual herbicides to combat challenging weeds. “Multiple modes of action can control a broader spectrum of weeds and greatly extend the effectiveness of weed control programs,” Pringnitz says.
  3. Less pressure on postemergence applications. Preemergence applications are vital in reducing the yield effect from early season weed competition and extending the postemergence application window. Failure to incorporate preemergence herbicides in your weed control program will likely result in the need for multiple postemergence applications, more weed escapes and greater risk of weed resistance.

Weed pressure will vary by operation, so Corteva Agriscience offers a variety of strong and flexible solutions — including powerful preemergence herbicides for soybean fields.

View the full soybean herbicide portfolio to design a program that makes sense for your customers.

Article Link

™ ® Trademarks of Corteva Agriscience and its affiliated companies.
© 2024 Corteva.
Groundwork – March 2024

Pre-Plant Nitrogen Optimization for Corn

Key Points

 

Potential Nitrogen Loss

Denitrification

Denitrification is the process by which soil bacteria that thrive in water-saturated (anaerobic) soils convert nitrate into gaseous forms of N. This bacterial conversion of nitrate into nitrogen gas can result in as much as 5% nitrate loss per day. Losses will be higher with warmer soil temperatures.

Leaching

Leaching occurs when nitrate moves downward in the soil profile, out of the root zone, due to excessive rainwater or irrigation. Fertilizers that contain urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) are highly susceptible to leaching, especially when applied to coarse-textured soils.

Volatilization

Volatilization can occur when urea-based fertilizers are surface-applied and not incorporated. Urease enzymes in the soil and plant residue convert urea to free ammonia gas. Up to 20% of urea-based N can volatilize within a week of application, especially on warm sunny days with moist soil surface conditions.

Volatilization can be inhibited or delayed through the use of products such as nitrification inhibitors, urease inhibitors, and polymer-coated urea.

 


(Figure 1). Anhydrous ammonia applications in the spring.

 

Nitrogen Application Timing

Fall applications have the greatest risk of N loss. Anhydrous ammonia is recommended for situations in which fall N applications are preferred, because it has the lowest loss risk of any N fertilizer. Anhydrous ammonia should be applied with a nitrification inhibitor when soil temperature is less than 50 °F (10 °C). A nitrification inhibitor works by slowing down the conversion of ammonium to nitrate in the soil, reducing the potential risk of N loss.

Spring pre-plant applications are generally preferable due to their lower potential for N loss and improved timing relative to rapid plant N uptake. However, spring can also be a time of large potential N loss due to wet soils. If N is applied more than two weeks prior to planting, anhydrous ammonia is recommended to help reduce the risk of loss. Nitrogen loss potential due to leaching is highest when applied to sandy or coarse-textured soils.

Strip till pre-plant fertilizer applications can apply both a N source and a second fertilizer, or combination of fertilizers, six to eight inches deep. This can be done in the fall or in the spring prior to planting. This one-trip tillage operation tills a narrow strip to prepare a seed bed while positioning pre-plant fertilizer several inches below the seed slice where the seed will be placed at planting. Placing a band of fertilizer into the future root zone increases plant utilization, especially if the soil has very low nutrient availability.

At-planting or in-season sidedress applications may be required if soil conditions or workload prevent a pre-plant application of N fertilizer, pushing the N application into the at-planting or in-season sidedress window. If such an application is required, note that any N source can be susceptible to denitrification if the soil is saturated after the application and after the N has been converted to nitrate by soil organisms. If available, fertigation using an overhead sprinkler irrigation can also effective.

Caution – Avoid placing high rates of N or potassium fertilizer in direct contact with seed to prevent potential seedling injury from salt burn.

 

Nitrogen Sources and Application

Ammonium and nitrate are the two forms of N used by plants. Other forms of N must be converted by soil organisms to one of these forms before plants can use them, and so the N source should be considered when determining which application method to use.

Anhydrous ammonia is the densest nitrogen source. All other nitrogen fertilizer sources are made from anhydrous ammonia, with additional manufacturing processes that reduce the concentration and typically increase the cost per unit of N (though cost can
be affected by seasonal supply and demand). However, all other N sources are generally easier to store and apply, and are safer to handle than anhydrous ammonia.

 

Table 1. Nitrogen (N) source and application.
N-Source Analysis Common Name N Form Time of Application Advantage of Product Primary Method of N Loss Use with N Stabilizer/Inhibitor
82-0-0 Anhydrous Ammonia Gas/Liquid Fall, Pre-plant, Sidedress Nitrogen Dense Volatilization Yes
46-0-0 Urea Dry Pellet Pre-Plant, Band Good Storage and Handling Volatilization/ Leaching Yes
28/32-0-0 Urea Ammonium Nitrate (UAN) Liquid Pre-plant, Sidedress Relatively Easy to Handle and Apply Volatilization/Leaching Yes

 

 

Determining the Nitrogen Application Rate

The rate of N applied is an important variable, because of the related economic and environmental issues. Determining the proper N application rate can be difficult due to the effects of temperature and precipitation on the release of N (mineralization) from the soil over time and after an application, and because microbial activity releases more N under good corn-growing conditions.

Before determining the amount of N to apply, the producer must:

Crop nitrogen needs and the corresponding N applications must be calculated every year and for every field. A common calculation to determine the total N needed for an acre of corn is multiplying the yield goal for the projected crop year by a factor of 1.0 to 1.2 pounds of N per bushel per acre, and applying N based upon yield goals and soil test levels has been a common method used in western corn growing areas.

Alternatively, several universities in the Corn Belt recommend using a “maximum return to N” (MRTN) formula to determine an appropriate N application rate. These calculations are made for a single N cost and corn price combination; different price combinations can be placed on the same graph to compare additional N cost and corn price combinations. Different states and different crop rotations are used to formulate different MRTN graphs for those situations. For more information on MRTN calculations, see the Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator at https://www.cornnratecalc.org/ or the Ontario Corn Nitrogen Calculator at http://www.gocorn.net/.

Consider all N sources when making application decisions, including any previous legume crops and manure applications, and credit the N supplied from those sources to reduce the amount of nitrogen fertilizer needed. Using variable rate technology to apply more N in fields or areas of fields where there is greater potential for response can also help increase yield potential.

 


Figure 2. A growing corn crop that is nitrogen deficient.

Article Link

 

Additional Resources
Scharf, P. and Lory, J. 2018. Best management practices for nitrogen fertilizer in Missouri. University of Missouri Extension. https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/ipm1027 Nowatzki, J., Endres, G., DeJong-Hughes, J., and Aakre, D. 2017. Strip till for field crop production. North Dakota State University. AE1370.
https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/strip-till-for-field-crop-production Sawyer, J. 2021. Corn nitrogen rate calculator. Iowa State University Agronomy and Extension Outreach. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/corn-nitrogen-rate-calculator
Legal Statements
ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Performance may vary, from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and environmental conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on their growing environment. The recommendations in this material are based upon trial observations and feedback received from a limited number of growers and growing environments. These recommendations should be consid-ered as one reference point and should not be substituted for the professional opinion of agronomists, entomologists or other relevant experts evaluating specific conditions. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2024 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 1213_58761

Managing Cover Crops Prior to Planting Corn

Cover crops can provide many benefits including weed suppression, reduction of soil erosion, improvement of soil quality, and—depending on the species of cover crop—provision of nitrogen for subsequent crops. Cover crops include grasses, legumes, brassicas, and even mixtures of all three. However, cover crops that compete with the growth of the primary crop, like corn, may defeat their purpose. Effective control or termination of the cover crop generally is necessary before the emergence of the primary crop. Commonly used cover crop termination methods include:

 

Q – Is timing critical when terminating a cover crop?

A – While it depends on the crop, it is important to terminate the cover crop at the correct time. For a field going to corn, the best management practice is to terminate 10 to 14 days ahead of corn planting. Timing is less critical when planting to soybean; however, killing the cover crop prior to emergence reduces the risk of lowered yield potential

 

Q – What are the advantages of using tillage to terminate cover crops?

A – Tillage not only terminates most cover crops but also incorporates them into the soil, allowing them to break down quickly and add nutrients to the corn crop. Chisel plowing is often necessary if large amounts of cover crop biomass are present. Chisel plowing followed by disking may be inadequate
for certain cover crops such as cereal rye if large amounts of residue are present. Terminating cereal rye early is critical for managing the amount of residue that will need to be incorporated with tillage. Tillage, however, will break soil aggregates, reducing soil organic matter by accelerating its decomposition and releasing carbon into the atmosphere.

 

Q – What are the advantages of using a crimper or roller to terminate cover crops?

A – Crop rollering or “crimping” is becoming a common way to mechanically terminate cover crops. Crimpers are rolling steel drums with blunt steel blades, which are either pulled by or front mounted on a tractor. As the crimper rolls through a cover crop, the blunt blade “crimps” or injures plant stems. The blades are usually curved or positioned in a chevron pattern at a 7-degree to 100-degree angle to reduce bouncing and soil movement, and to increase the maximum pressure placed on plant stems. If crimping is done properly, a 90 to 100% kill rate is possible without the use of herbicides. This method can be used to kill grass cover crops, vetches, annual clovers, buckwheat, and multi-species cover crops. However, crimpers do not work well with perennial cover crops like red clover, alfalfa, or annual ryegrass.

 

Crimping provides the best results when used on annual cover crops, when the heads or flowers are in the “boot” or head stage, near the end of the plant growth cycle. Advantages of crimping include the ability to kill cover crops mechanically while suppressing weeds by forming a mulch, which also decreases summer soil temperatures. A disadvantage of crimping is that the cover crop has to be crimped at the right stage (boot or head stage) for this termination method to be effective. Crimping cover crops works well when planting to corn or soybean but does not work well when planting to small-seeded crops.

 

Q – Can mowing be effective in terminating cover crops prior to planting corn

A – Mowing can be used to successfully terminate certain cover crops prior to planting the primary corn crop. Producers should mow hairy vetch when the first purple flowers are visible. Mowing vetch prior to flowering can fail to provide adequate control and can result in both crop competition and the production of vetch seed if the cover crop is allowed to flower after regrowth, which could affect future crop production. Mowing vetch after pod formation may result in seeds being deposited into the soil, which may impact subsequent crops.

Where cereal grain is used for cover crops, producers should mow after heading to ensure successful termination. Mowing prior to head emergence will likely result in regrowth from tillers. Regrowth from cereal grains harvested for forage in the boot stage of growth is a common problem for producers who do not use an appropriate herbicide program or tillage.

 

Q – Which cover crop plants can be either mechanically incorporated or mowed prior to planting corn?

A – Certain cereal crops such as oats, wheat, and triticale can be mechanically incorporated, mowed after heading, or used as a forage crop.

 

Q – Can herbicides be used to successfully terminate cover crops prior to planting corn?

A – Herbicide use for terminating cover crops prior to planting corn is dictated by the cover crop being used, any weed species present, and the stage of growth of both the cover crop and weeds. Large plants that are bolting, jointing, or in the reproductive stage of growth may need greater rates of herbicide or additional control methods such as crimping, mowing, or tilling.

Non-selective herbicides and systemic herbicides are the primary classes of herbicides that should be used for best control. Actively growing crops in warm environmental temperatures have higher metabolic rates that move systemic herbicides to their site of action more quickly. Applications should be made after three to four days of daytime temperatures in the high 50 to 60 °F (10 to 15.5 °C) range and with nighttime temperatures greater than 40 °F (4 °C).

When using herbicides for terminating cover crops, use the correct rate. With certain herbicides, like glyphosate, the addition of ammonium sulfate (AMS) will help the activity of the herbicide. If broadleaf weeds are present, consider a tank mixture with a growth regulator at the recommended rate.
To ensure good coverage, spray volumes should be 10 to 15 gallons per acre (94 to 140 liters/hectare), with nozzles that produce medium to coarse droplets. Additional herbicides may be necessary if weed species are present; herbicides used to terminate cover crops should be selected to avoid carryover to emerging corn plants. Check with your herbicide provider for specific herbicide recommendations and treatment rates for your area.

 

Q – What is the best control measure for terminating annual ryegrass?

A – Glyphosate should be used at a full labeled rate for ryegrass control. Cereal rye and annual ryegrass are commonly used as cover crops, and each species has distinct characteristics. Both species have nitrogen scavenging abilities, though annual ryegrass may take up and store more nitrogen compared to cereal rye. Generally, cereal rye is more sensitive to glyphosate compared to annual ryegrass. Avoid tank mixes of glyphosate with atrazine or HPPD inhibitor herbicides. Termination of annual ryegrass is most effective when herbicides are applied before the formation of the first node/joint and the plant is actively growing. Once the third node/joint appears, control is reduced because of limited translocation as active growth within the plant goes toward reproduction/seed formation. Growers should scout fields to confirm complete death of all rye plants and to demine if additional control methods are needed. An additional herbicide application with an alternative site of action could be considered when going to corn. Avoid applications of systemic herbicides three to four hours before sunset.

 

Q – Which cover crops are controlled by winter kill?

A – Winter kill can be an effective termination method but is only possible in northern climates. Certain cover crops that are susceptible to the first hard frost (temperatures below 25 °F) can be terminated by winter kill. Examples of cover crops that will winter kill are turnips, radishes, field peas, and oats.

 

Q – What is the nitrogen credit for cover crops?

A – There is a short video from the University of Minnesota that provides information on how to assess the nitrogen credit for various cover crops8, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zumgLm_6HKY.

 

Q – Does the Risk Management Agency have an incentive plan for the use of cover crops?

A – Yes. Contact your local Risk Management Agency Office for details.

 

Q – What should be considered if planting corn into a “green” cover crop?

A – If planting into a living or green cover crop, adequate nitrogen should be applied at planting, the opener discs on the planter should be sharp and well-maintained, planting depth must be correct, and the seed slot should be properly closed.

 

Q – What other considerations are there for controlling cover crops prior to planting corn?

A – The Midwest Cover Crop Council has specific information on controlling cover crops for many states and provinces. See, https://www.midwestcovercrops.org/. The USDA agencies—Farm Service Agency (FSA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and Risk Management Agency (RMA)—have updated their cover crop termination requirements. To maintain farm program eligibility for federal crop insurance on spring-planted crops and other programs, check with you local FSA for specific cover crop termination dates for your area.

 

Article Link

 

Sources
2013 – 2014 cover crop survey report. Conservation Technology Information Center and North Central Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education.
https://www.ctic.org/files/CTIC_04_Cover_Crops_report.pdf
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE). 2007. Managing cover crops profitably, third edition, handbook series book 9. Sustainable Agriculture Network.
https://www.sare.org/resources/managing-cover-crops-profitably-3rd-edition/
Legleiter, T., Johnson, B., Jordan, T., and Gibson, K. 2012. Terminating cover crops: Successful cover crop termination with herbicides. Purdue University. WS-50-W.
https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ws/ws-50-w.pdf
Loux, M. 2007. Burndown herbicide activity – Can we kill anything when it’s this cold? The Ohio State University. C.O.R.N. Newsletter, 2007-08. https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletters/2007/08#1
Schomberg, H. and Balkcom, K. 2009. Cover crops. Soil Quality for Environmental Health.
http://soilquality.org/practices/cover_crops.html
Midwest cover crop council. Species. www.mccc.msu.edu
Curran, W.S., Lingenfelter, D.D., Garling, L., and Wagoner, P. 2006. Cover crops for conservation tillage systems. Penn State Cooperative Extension. Conservation Tillage Series, Number 5.
https://northeastcovercrops.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Cover-Crops-for-Conservation-Tillage-Systems.pdf?x65878
[U of M Extension Small Farms]. 2020. Estimating nitrogen credits from cover crops [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zumgLm_6HKY
Legal Statements
ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Performance may vary, from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and environmental conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on their growing environment. The recommendations in this material are based upon trial observations and feedback received from a limited number of growers and growing environments. These recommendations should be consid-ered as one reference point and should not be substituted for the professional opinion of agronomists, entomologists or other relevant experts evaluating specific conditions. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2024 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 1223_103817

Irrigation Termination for Soybean

 

Soybean Water Usage

Knowing the optimal time to terminate irrigation can help maximize profitability, as continuing to irrigate longer than needed adds cost with minimal return. However, discontinuing irrigation too soon can result in yield penalties due to decreased seed size. It is especially important to provide adequate water to soybean from growth stages R3 (beginning pod) through R6 (full seed), which are the most sensitive to water stress and potential yield losses.

 

When to Terminate Irrigation

Methods for determining when to terminate irrigation include testing soil moisture by hand in conjunction with soil moisture sensors (i.e., capacitance probes or tensiometers) or a moisture deficit accounting system. In general, a full soil water profile during the R6 growth stage should be enough to bring the crop through maturity without inducing water stress. If irrigation scheduling is being used to monitor soil moisture, factor in the predicted maturity date of the crop, the estimated water use to maturity (example given in Table 1, may vary by region), and current soil moisture levels to determine when to stop irrigating. Irrigations should provide only what is needed to maintain soil moisture above 50% until the end of R7 growth stage. However, it is critical to monitor soil moisture through R7 because conditions that increase water use such as high heat, high winds, and low humidity may require extra irrigation to prevent yield loss. By R8, water is no longer needed for seed enlargement and soil moisture can be allowed to reach 60% depleted.

 

Table 1. Example of water requirements for soybean during late reproductive stages through maturity.
Growth stage Days to maturity Water use to maturity
R4 – Full Pod. Pods are 3/4 inch (19 mm) long on at least one of the four uppermost nodes 50 8.5 inches (21.5 cm)
R5 – Beginning Seed EnlargemWaent.
Seed is 1/8 inch (3 mm) long in a pod located on one of the four uppermost nodes
40 5.5 inches (14.5 cm)
R6 – Full Seed. Pod contains at least one green seed that fills the pod cavity located on one of the four uppermost nodes 30 3.5 inches (9 cm)
R7 – Beginning Maturity. One pod located on one of the four uppermost nodes has reached mature pod color. 10 1.0 inches (2.5 cm)
R8 – Full Maturity. 95% of the pods have reached mature pod color 0 0
Table modified from 3Soybean irrigation and water use. University of Missouri Extension. https://extension.missouri.edu/media/wysiwyg/Extensiondata/CountyPages/Scott/Soybean-Irrigation-and-Water-Use.pdf

 

Another approach is to determine when pods reach the full seed (R6) growth stage and estimate soil moisture from soil samples. In general, if soil moisture is adequate and 50% or more of the pods have seeds that are fully formed, then irrigation can be terminated. If the soil is beginning to dry, one additional irrigation should be applied to ensure that all seeds reach their maximum weight. If pods are not fully filled and soil is dry, one or more irrigations will be needed to achieve full yield potential. Recommendations on when to terminate irrigation during the R6 growth stage are also dependent on various soil factors. For example, irrigation will be required later in R6 and possibly even into the R7 growth stage on soils with low plant available water holding capacity or when root-restricting layers are present in the soil profile.

Article Link

Sources
Helsel, D.G. and Helsel, Z.R. 1993. Irrigating soybeans. Publication G4420. University of Missouri Extension.
https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g4420
Yonts, C.D., Melvin, S.R., and Eisenhauer, D.E. 2008. Predicting the last irrigation of the season. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. NebGuide G1871. https://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/html/g1871/build/g1871.htm
Soybean irrigation and water use. University of Missouri Extension. https://extension.missouri.edu/media/wysiwyg/Extensiondata/CountyPages/Scott/Soybean-Irrigation-and-Water-Use.pdf
Additional Resources
Tacker, P. and Vories, E. Chapter 8: Irrigation. In Arkansas Soybean Production Handbook – MP197. University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. https://www.uaex.uada.edu/publications/MP-197.aspx
Legal Statements
ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Performance may vary, from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and environmental conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on their growing environment. The recommendations in this material are based upon trial observations and feedback received from a limited number of growers and growing environments. These recommendations should be consid-ered as one reference point and should not be substituted for the professional opinion of agronomists, entomologists or other relevant experts evaluating specific conditions. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2024 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 1321_59491

High pH and Salt Issues in Corn

Key Points

Salinity, sodicity, and high pH in soils can impact plant growth and yield potential. These issues are common in the western growing regions of the US, such as the Great Plains, and are primarily caused by the weathering or breakdown of soil parent material or by the use of poor-quality irrigation water.

 

High pH, Salinity, and Sodicity

Soil pH is a measure of the acidity (low pH) or alkalinity (high pH) of the soil. The pH value for good corn production is between 6.0 to 6.5. High pH problems are associated with a pH 7.8 or higher and are often accompanied by saline soils, sodic soils, or saline-sodic soils. Problems with soil pH
(either too high or too low) can cause the following issues in plants:

 


Figure 1. The relationship between soil pH and nutrient availability. The wider the dark bar, the greater the nutrient availability. Image courtesy of Fernández, F.G. and Hoeft, R.G. Managing soil pH and crop nutrients. Chapter 8. Illinois Agronomy Handbook. University of Illinois.

 

Soil salinity is the content of soluble salts in the soil, which can readily dissolve in the soil water solution and be taken up by plants. These salt ions include sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+), calcium (Ca2+), chloride (Cl- ), sulfate (SO42-), carbonate (CO32-), bicarbonate (HCO3- ), and nitrate (NO3- ).

Soil sodicity is the concentration of exchangeable sodium ions in the soil. Sodic soils have high levels of sodium and low levels of other salts. Sodic soils can have structural issues because the sodium ions weaken soil aggregates, resulting in a collapse of the soil structure. This is especially common in sodic soils with high clay or silt content. Sodic soils often have a high pH, often greater than 8.4.

Some soils may have both high saline and high sodium levels; these are termed saline-sodic soils. When salts build up in the soil, the following issues can occur in plants:

 

Identifying and Managing Salt and pH Issues:

 

Management options for high pH soils:

Note that it may be more difficult to lower the pH of high pH soils than to manage their soil nutrient availabilities. This is because high pH is often caused by the parent material of the soil, which will continue to break down over time and buffer any attempts to acidify the soil. Soils that contain free carbonates are the most difficult to alter in terms of pH, though the addition of thiosulfate to a 2 x 2 starter maybe helpful.

 

Management options for saline soils:

 

Management options for sodic soils:

Note that the practice of leaching the salts from the soil may also remove soil nutrients and pesticides, and will reduce irrigation efficiency. Consider the soil fertility level (fall may be the best time as nutrients have already been utilized by the plant), drainage, the quality of the irrigation water at the time of the leaching event, the availability of the irrigation water, and the type of irrigation system (to ensure the irrigation capacity is sufficient to apply enough water in a short enough of time to cause leaching).

Article Link

Sources
Waskom, R.M., Bauder, T., Davis, J.G., and Andales, A.A. 2012. Diagnosing saline and sodic soil problems. Fact sheet 0.521. Colorado State University. https://extension.colostate.edu/docs/pubs/crops/00521.pdf
Bauder, T.A., Davis, J.G., and Waskom, R.M. 2014. Managing saline soils. Fact sheet 0.503. Colorado State University. https://extension.colostate.edu/docs/pubs/crops/00503.pdf
Davis, J.G., Waskom, R.M., and Bauder, T.A. 2012. Managing sodic soils. Fact sheet 0.504. Colorado State University. https://extension.colostate.edu/docs/pubs/crops/00504.pdf
Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wakeel, A., and Siddique, K.H.M. 2015. Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(2):461–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0287-0
Fernández, F.G. and Hoeft, R.G. Managing soil pH and crop nutrients. Chapter 8. Illinois Agronomy Handbook. University of Illinois.
Legal Statements
ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Performance may vary, from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and environmental conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on their growing environment. The recommendations in this material are based upon trial observations and feedback received from a limited number of growers and growing environments. These recommendations should be consid-ered as one reference point and should not be substituted for the professional opinion of agronomists, entomologists or other relevant experts evaluating specific conditions. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2024 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 1210_356000

Assessing Corn and Soybean Stands

 

General Suggestions

When evaluating a corn or soybean stand, only count plants that have a good chance of survival. Sample at several locations in the field and obtain an average across the sample locations to get a better assessment of the population. Taking more samples will improve the accuracy of the estimate. Keep in mind the differences in assessing corn and soybean stands. For example, while corn plant populations are a critical component of yield, soybean plants are better able to compensate for low plant populations.

 

1/1000th Acre Method

Count the number of plants in a length of row equal to 1/1000th of an acre based on row width (Table 1). Multiply the number of plants by 1000 to get plants per acre.

Table 1. Stand count evaluation for 1/1000th acre based on row width and number of plants in a given row length.
Row width (inches) Row Length to equal 1/1000th of an acre (feet, inches)
7.5 69′ 8″
15 34′ 10″
20 26′ 2″
22 23′ 9″
30 17′ 5″
36 14′ 6″
38 13′ 9″
40 13′ 1″

 

Wheel Method

Count 150 plants and measure the distance from the first plant to the last plant with a measuring wheel. Divide the appropriate factor in Table 2 by the number of feet traveled to determine plant population. For example, if you walked 94 feet while counting 150 plants in 30-inch rows, the population is 2,613,600 ÷ 94 = 27,804 plants per acre.

 

Table 2. Stand count evaluation factors for measuring the distance when counting 150 plants.
Row width (inches) Factor
20 3,920,400
30 2,163,600
36 2,178,000
38 2,063,350

 

Hoop Method

This method should be used for drilled soybeans. Measure the diameter of a hoop, toss it into the field, and count the number of plants inside the hoop. Multiply the average number of plants from the samples taken by the appropriate factor listed in Table 3 to get the number of plants per acre. For example, a hoop with a diameter of 28 ¼ inches can be multiplied by 10,000 to obtain the number of plants per acre. This size of hoop can be made by cutting a tube to 88 ¾ inches and joining it to form a circle.

 

Table 3. Stand count evaluation factors, by hoop diameter, for determining soybean plant populations using the hoop method.
Diameter of Hoop (inches) Factor
18 24,662
21 18,119
24 13,872
27 10,961
28.25 10,000
30 8,878
33 7,337
36 6,165

 

Try to Determine the Cause of a Poor Stand

There are many things that can result in a poor stand. Consider the entire field when assessing the stand.

 

Is a Replant Needed?

Several factors should be considered when assessing a corn or soybean stand for potential replanting, including if the field is irrigated or dryland, the current plant population, plant spacing, and the potential date any replanting.

 

Article Link

Sources
Gerber, K. 2021. 2023 corn & soybean field guide. Purdue University.
Roth, R. (Ed.) 2023. Georgia Corn Production Guide. University of Georgia Extension. https://grains.caes.uga.edu/content/dam/caes-subsite/grains/docs/corn/2023-Corn-Production-Guide.pdf
Wiebold, W. and Massey, R. 2022, revised. Corn and soybean replant decisions. University of Missouri Extension. https://extension. missouri.edu/publications/g4091
Legal Statements
ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS.
Performance may vary, from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and environmental conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on their growing environment. The recommendations in this material are based upon trial observations and feedback received from a limited number of growers and growing environments. These recommendations should be consid-ered as one reference point and should not be substituted for the professional opinion of agronomists, entomologists or other relevant experts evaluating specific conditions. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2023 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 1114_96568.